• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Dores and Essich Community

  • Home
  • Covid-19
  • News
  • Planning matters
  • Services & Info
  • Events
  • Local Businesses
  • Community Council
  • Dores Community Development Trust
  • Dores Village Hall

Original resolution of the CC to the Red John planning application.

August 13, 2020 by johntorbreck

Dores and Essich Community Council
Resolution re Red John PSH Project
18th March, 2019

  1. Dores and Essich Community Council (DECC) believes that, in order to mitigate the
    effects of climate change and global warming, increased reliance needs to be placed on
    generating electricity from renewable sources, as is expressed in Scottish Government
    policy.
    It also believes that pumped storage hydro schemes potentially have an important role
    to play in supporting such a policy as, in effect, they can be used to store the excess
    electricity generated by renewables when demand is low.
  2. With regard to the Red John scheme DECC considers it regrettable that scheme Option
    A was rejected in favour of scheme Option B without sufficient consultation with the
    community as to the inherent risks which have since become apparent.
  3. If scheme Option A were to have been promoted DECC would be minded to support
    this proposal, subject to satisfactory scrutiny of the detailed plans.
  4. Since scheme Option B remains the chosen option, DECC has serious concerns about
    the headpond being located directly above the village of Dores and over a known
    geological fault. After careful consideration, DECC has resolved to object to this
    proposal due to the lack of compelling evidence as to how these concerns can be
    mitigated and due to the lack of a satisfactory insurance-backed indemnity to
    compensate any local residents in the event of them being affected by a breach in the
    headpond.
  5. Irrespective of which option is finally chosen, DECC would object to the proposals
    unless the following conditions were placed on the developer:
    i) The setting up of a satisfactory and enforceable traffic management scheme during
    the construction phase;
    ii) The setting up of a satisfactory and enforceable noise, dust and vibration mitigation
    scheme during the construction phase;
    iii) Satisfactory architectural treatment (which may include screening) of any prominent
    structures at the headpond and the waterside site.
    iv) The signing of a satisfactory legally binding agreement with the developer
    regarding community benefit and community investment in the project

Filed Under: Planning matters

Copyright © 2025 ยท Log in